Annex Za-2.6: Final Decision on Forced Placement of Oscar Dan Li (March 2025) / Oscar Dan Li被强制寄养终审判决（2025年3月）

 

Za-2.6– Final Decision on Forced Placement of Oscar Dan Li
by Ankestyrelsen (March 2025)
Document Type: Official case decision by the Danish National Social
Appeals Board
Case Number:25-5890
Date: 27 March2025
Issued to: Beizi Li & Lin Qiang
Child Involved: Oscar Dan Li (b. 12 May 2015
Decision Summary:
Oscar will remain placed outside of the family home under
forced care.
The case must be re-reviewed within two years of the decision
date.
The Appeals Board confirmed that both parents are considered
unfit to meet Oscar’s developmental and emotional needs.
Key Groundsfor Decision:
Oscar has allegedly suffered neglect and risk of harm in the
family environment;
Authorities concluded that even with support measures, the
parents cannot provide sufficient care;
Beizi Li is considered to have a chronic mental illness and
impaired cognitive functioning, and was convicted of sexual
abuse against the child;
Lin Qiang, despite being present and loving, failed to protect Oscar
and is viewed as lacking insight into the child’s basic needs.
Child’s Position (Oscar):
Oscar is described as thriving in foster care;
He completed psychological treatment, performs well in school,
and explicitly refused to return to Lin Qiang’s household;
Oscar’s emotional reaction to the idea of returning home was one of
distress and crying;
Oscar has expressed no desire to see his mother, and reportedly
fears potential future contact.
Legal Basis:
Decision issued under §47 of the Danish Child Protection Act,
allowing forced placement without parental consent;
Reassessment must occur within 2 years of the initial decision or
latest judicial ruling.
Relevance to ECHR/Z-1 Report:
This document proves that:
The Danish government formally enforces long-term,
non-consensual separation between Beizi Li and her child;
The state justified this action based on psychiatric labeling and a
criminal conviction that itself is disputed;
The child is effectively cut off from both parents, with visits strictly
controlled and rights of contact suspended;
This ruling constitutes an ongoing violation of Article 8 of the
EuropeanConvention onHumanRights(righttofamily life),
and supports claims of institutional retaliation following Ms. Li’s
persistent legal complaints.