E-2: Psychiatric Evaluation Evidence / 精神评估证据

Case Summary / 案件摘要

This page presents critical psychiatric evaluation evidence, including audio recordings and the disputed 34-page evaluation report. The recordings expose procedural violations and coercive tactics by evaluators, while the report demonstrates fabricated psychiatric conclusions used to justify forced treatment and legal suppression.
本页面收录与精神评估相关的核心证据，包括录音和存在争议的34页评估报告。录音揭示评估过程中的违规与胁迫手段，而该34页报告则展现被伪造的精神诊断结论，被用作强制治疗与法律打压的依据。

Responsible Chain / 责任链

Court → Psychiatric Evaluation Center → Evaluating Doctors
法院 → 司法精神评估中心 → 评估医师

Evaluation Process Violations / 评估过程违规

1. Biased and leading questions during evaluations.
2. Disregard for patient’s statements and evidence submission rights.
3. Fabrication of psychiatric conclusions without clinical basis.

1. 评估过程中存在带有偏见和诱导性的提问。
2. 无视患者陈述与提交证据的权利。
3. 无临床依据地伪造精神诊断结论。