Annex Za-2.2: Fønix Assessment Document (2022) / Fønix评估报告（2022）

The child has received family treatment from Fønix since June 2021. After
several months of family conversations, Fønix concludes that the case seems
to be based on cultural misunderstanding. The child does not show symptoms
of sexual trauma, and there is no indication of inappropriate sexual contact
with the mother. The evaluation has been closed and reported as such in Feb
2022.
Official Translation Summary– Fønix Case
Closure Decision (14 Feb 2022)
Source: Borgercenter Børn og Unge, Municipality of Copenhagen
Date: 14 February 2022
Reference: Case no. 3-6000058837
Issued by: Ida Rude
Administrative Decision: Termination of Fønix Intervention
andCase Closure
To: Beizi Li and Qiang Lin
The Child and Youth Services of the Copenhagen Municipality (Valby,
Vesterbro, Kgs. Enghave district) has decided that the child, Oscar, will no
longer receive support through Fønix, according to §52(3)(3) of the Danish
Social Services Act. We assess that the intervention is no longer appropriate as
defined by §68(1).
Justification:
According to the Fønix follow-up meeting on 7 December 2021 and
the final evaluation note dated 20 January 2022, the stated goals of6
the intervention — namely, to process Oscar’s alleged experiences of
sexual abuse by his parents — cannot be achieved at the present
time.
Fønix assesses that Oscar appears as an anxious and
emotionally immature child, who uses an avoidant strategy when
asked about his emotions during play and conversation.
Fønix concludes that they have not succeeded in helping Oscar or
his parents develop a coherent understanding of what may have
occurred.
Fønix further states that before Oscar can work through any
possible experiences of sexual abuse, there is a need for targeted
efforts focusing on his relational environment and how to better
meet his developmental needs.
Fønix recommends that compensatory measures should be maintained
and potentially intensified.
Parental Input and Child Consultation:
The parents were informed and agreed that termination of the Fønix
intervention was acceptable.
Ms. Li expressed a willingness to learn how to meet Oscar’s emotional
needs.
Due to the extensive process over the past six months, and in order to
protect the child, Oscar was not directly consulted about the
decision to close the case (per Social Services Act §48).
His viewpoint was inferred from the descriptions provided by all
involved professionals.
Although the report does not contain a formal declaration of
innocence, it clearly shows that:
The institution found no grounds to continue the intervention;
No credible or consistent testimony was established to support
sexual abuse claims;
The case was administratively closed without referral to police or
judicial prosecution;
Focus shifted from alleged abuse to general emotional support,
which implicitly indicates the original allegations could not be
substantiated.