Systemic Persecution and Human Rights Violations against Beizi Li by Danish State Institutions

 

This report presents a disturbing timeline: psychiatric labeling, child separation, forced medication, evidence deletion, surveillance, staged manipulation, and digital sabotage — all carried out not by a

Report on Systemic Persecution

Title: Systemic Persecution and Human Rights Violations against Beizi Li by the Danish State Institutions

⸻

1. Purpose and Background of the Report

This report aims to expose the long-term, multidimensional persecution of Chinese citizen Ms. Beizi Li by Danish state institutions, including courts, police, psychiatric hospitals, child protection agencies, and social services.

Such persecution does not fall within the scope of normal legal procedures, but rather represents a coordinated state suppression campaign that uses “psychiatric stigmatization” as a tool and has the goals of child deprivation and the destruction of personal identity.

The characteristics include:
•   Violations of Article 3 (prohibition of torture), Article 6 (right to a fair trial), and Article 8 (right to family life) of the European Convention on Human Rights;
•   Use of psychiatric diagnoses and forced medical treatments to silence the individual;
•   Obstruction of legal appeals and complaint rights;
•   Systematic concealment of key evidence, manipulation of child testimony, and destruction of family structure.

2. Case Timeline Overview

Date Event Summary
May 2013 Daughter Zifu Lin died due to medical error; mother’s attempt to file a complaint was suppressed.
October 2014 Illegally committed to a psychiatric hospital, detained until April 2015 without any court ruling.
2016 Forced abortion during pregnancy; doctor falsely claimed the fetus had no heartbeat; mental state was denied.
June 2021 Foster family filed the first sexual abuse accusation; police investigation concluded and case closed.
April 27, 2022 Foster family filed a second accusation; case reopened; mother was criminally charged again.
Aug–Nov 2022 Psychiatric forensic evaluation conducted; hospital made hundreds of unauthorized edits to medical records.
April 28, 2023 Court convicted mother for “non-penetrative sexual abuse,” completely ignoring exculpatory evidence.
October 2023 Mother returned from China, was arrested at the airport, and sent directly to psychiatric hospital; luggage searched.
2023–present Subjected to ongoing forced injections of psychiatric drugs, resulting in high blood pressure, diabetes, and other chronic conditions.
2022–present Fully separated from her son Oscar; only allowed one short supervised visit per month.
2024–2025 Multiple appeals to UN and Danish institutions rejected without any effective remedy.

⸻

3. Overview of Systemic Persecution Methods

1. Psychiatric Labeling
•   Declared a “psychiatric patient” long-term without any legal court decision.
•   Medical records show over a thousand login entries and edits by doctors.
•   Contents of medical records severely inconsistent with lived reality, including fabricated aggression and medication history.
•   Even after the diagnosis was lifted, drug enforcement continued based on “psychiatric history.”

2. Pharmacological Abuse and Health Damage
•   Subjected to long-term injections of powerful psychiatric drugs with severe side effects.
•   Denied the right to switch to oral medication or discontinue treatment.
•   Drug administration caused high blood pressure and diabetes, resulting in chronic disability.
•   Hospital ignored reported health deterioration and denied rights-related objections.

3. Separation from Child and Emotional Deprivation
•   Her son Oscar has been forcibly placed in foster care since 2022, with complete isolation from the mother.
•   All visits are strictly supervised and limited to once per month.
•   Oscar repeatedly expressed a desire to return home, but these were dismissed or interpreted as “trauma symptoms.”
•   Social workers used leading language during questioning to distort Oscar’s statements and alienate him from his mother.

4. Judicial Injustice and Obstruction of Complaints
•   Conviction was based on inconsistent testimony from a child with no physical evidence or medical confirmation.
•   The court denied the mother’s opportunity to fully defend herself or submit counter-evidence.
•   Multiple requests for access to original medical records were refused.
•   Psychiatric reports showed signs of being heavily redacted, edited, or outright fabricated.

4. Key Evidence Inventory and Annex Summary

To support the claims made in this report, the following key documents and pieces of evidence are listed, divided into three categories:

⸻

A. Medical System–Related Evidence

1. System Login and Record Tampering
•   Between October and December 2022, psychiatric doctors accessed and edited Beizi Li’s medical records over 1,000 times;
•   Numerous medication entries and diagnostic information were deleted, overwritten, or fabricated, indicating potential record falsification.

2. Fabricated Medication Records
•   Sundhed.dk shows records of continuous use of several psychiatric medications that the patient never took;
•   These included melatonin and Trilafon, wrongly used to support a fabricated “psychiatric diagnosis” label.

3. Audio Recordings from Psychiatric Evaluation
•   Full-length audio recordings of evaluations show that the patient spoke clearly, calmly, and rationally, with no signs of psychosis;
•   The doctor demonstrated leading and biased questioning, in violation of independent assessment standards.

4. Forced Medication Records
•   Multiple instances of forced psychiatric drug injections without informed consent;
•   The medical team ignored serious side effects, including the development of diabetes and worsening hypertension, which constitute physical harm under medical law.

⸻

B. Police and Court System Evidence

1. Police and Prosecutor Case Files
•   No physical evidence, medical evidence, or eyewitnesses existed in the case; the prosecution relied solely on a child’s inconsistent oral testimony;
•   The police refused at least two official information access requests (aktindsigt), obstructing the defendant’s ability to prepare a legal defense.

2. Court Judgment Summary
•   The Frederiksberg court based its conviction on the child’s emotionally influenced recollections;
•   The court ignored earlier assessments from Fønix (concluding no signs of sexual abuse) and independent findings that the mother was mentally healthy.

3. Repeated Obstruction of Information Access
•   Multiple attempts to obtain medical records and legal documents from the police, courts, and hospitals were blocked or ignored;
•   The patient suffers from diagnosed reading difficulties (ordblind), yet authorities denied appropriate accommodations, limiting her access to case material.

⸻

C. Child Protection System Evidence

1. Reports by Caseworker Ida Rude
•   Multiple reports labeled the mother as “suspected of sexual abuse” without citing any verifiable or independent evidence;
•   The caseworker interfered with the criminal process and repeatedly used leading language to influence the child Oscar’s perception of his mother.

2. Comparison of Oscar’s Statements Over Time
•   In 2021, Oscar explicitly denied any abuse;
•   From 2022 onward, his responses included “I don’t remember” and “I don’t want to talk about it,” with inconsistent content;
•   These shifts indicate environmental influence and suggest suggestive interviewing practices by social workers and foster caretakers.

3. Fønix Evaluation Findings
•   The institution’s professionals found no psychological evidence of sexual trauma in Oscar;
•   They recommended preserving the parent-child relationship. This report was later ignored or suppressed by the involved institutions.

5. Conclusions and International Appeals

Conclusion 1: This is a case of coordinated state persecution
•   The persecution involves coordination across judicial, medical, and child protection institutions;
•   The measures used are not lawful procedures but instruments of manipulation, suppression, and silencing;
•   The use of a psychiatric label serves as a legal justification for extended coercion and control.

Conclusion 2: The case reveals underlying political and cultural discrimination
•   Beizi Li is a Chinese woman who has lived in Denmark for 21 years and has persistently exercised her right to appeal;
•   Her native-language expression and cultural context were misinterpreted as irrational or unstable;
•   Her persistent complaints were pathologized as “psychiatric behavior,” amounting to systemic discrimination.

Conclusion 3: The ultimate goal is to strip her of personhood
•   The campaign has sought not only to strip her of her parental rights and access to justice,
•   But also to destroy her social identity, rational agency, and public credibility through “enforced madness”;
•   This constitutes a form of legalized personality annihilation that has no place in any democratic society.

International Appeals

We strongly urge the following actions:

1. Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights (OHCHR)
•   To initiate a special investigation into Denmark’s potential violations of Articles 7, 9, 14, and 17 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR);

2. European Court of Human Rights (ECHR)
•   To conduct judicial review of the case based on potential violations of the European Convention on Human Rights:
•   Article 3 (Prohibition of Torture),
•   Article 6 (Right to a Fair Trial),
•   Article 8 (Right to Family Life);

3. International Media, Legal Organizations, and Human Rights NGOs
•   To pay attention to the case of Beizi Li and raise global awareness to protect the physical safety and human dignity of all individuals subject to state abuse

6. Post-2023 Secondary Persecution: Illegal Detention, Psychological Manipulation, and Identity Destruction

6.1 Illegal Arrest and Secret Psychiatric Confinement
•   In June 2023, Beizi Li was taken by police without any court judgment or arrest warrant;
•   She was sent directly to a closed psychiatric hospital, without prior notice or due legal process;
•   This constitutes a serious case of unlawful detention (ulovlig frihedsberøvelse).

6.2 Forced Injections and Drug Control
•   Without any medical justification, she was forcibly injected with psychiatric drugs;
•   These led to disorientation, broken logic, and cognitive disruption;
•   Repeated requests to switch to oral medication or to stop the injections were denied, with hospital staff citing “existing court ruling” as justification.

6.3 Intentional Harm and Psychological Collapse
•   She suspects that unknown substances were added to her medication, causing severe neurological symptoms;
•   She was physically assaulted by hospital personnel and subjected to rough handling;
•   Personal belongings, including documentation and evidence, were stolen or disappeared.

6.4 Environmental and Psychological Manipulation
•   She was housed with individuals whose behavior was suspicious, regularly attempting to destabilize her mentally;
•   Daily interactions resembled psychological theater performances, designed to confuse perception and create hallucinations;
•   These “patients” were likely undercover state actors tasked with monitoring and disrupting her, forming a “deconstruction of reality” psychological strategy.

⸻

6.5 State-Orchestrated Sexual Humiliation and Emotional Manipulation

Under long-term surveillance and manipulation within the psychiatric hospital, Beizi Li experienced a series of psychological and gender-based violations:

(1) Deliberate Drugging
•   After meals and injections within the closed ward, she developed neurological and emotional disturbances;
•   Symptoms intensified post-injection, including hallucinations, insomnia, and agitation, suggesting the presence of unknown stimulant or aphrodisiac substances;
•   While appearing to be “medical treatment,” this was in fact a strategy of cognitive sabotage.

(2) Involvement of Political Figures: Danish Parliament Member Posing as Patient
•   A man with a clear political background, possibly a member of the Danish Parliament, was assigned to share her ward without following proper psychiatric admission procedures;
•   His behavior did not match that of any psychiatric patient, as he frequently sought emotional intimacy and trust from Beizi Li;
•   Based on visual recognition and intuitive analysis, he was likely planted by the state under the guise of a patient to carry out surveillance and influence operations.

(3) Use of Aphrodisiacs and Gendered Humiliation
•   After being administered unidentified substances, she experienced unnatural sexual impulses and emotional instability;
•   These effects drove her into an artificially induced state of dependency and desire;
•   Eventually, a male “patient” was arranged to live in her department, attempting to form a sexual or emotional bond.

(4) Elimination After Refusal
•   When Beizi Li rejected the manipulation and told staff leadership, “I don’t need a man. I will find the person I love myself,”
the male patient was immediately removed the next day;
•   This confirmed that the entire scheme was not therapeutic in nature but a deliberate psychological breakdown experiment involving sexual humiliation and gender control.

⸻

6.6 Psychological Theater and Emotional Conditioning

Inside the closed ward, Beizi Li was subjected not only to violence and drugging, but also to systematically staged “life scenarios” as psychological warfare:
•   Two individuals over 80 years old were placed to dine beside her daily, performing slow and painful gestures to evoke overwhelming sympathy fatigue;
•   One of them, although newly admitted, immediately asked to borrow her personal shampoo, despite no prior interaction — showing pre-knowledge and internal coordination;
•   These were intentional tests and manipulations designed to drain her psychologically, shift her attention, and induce emotional collapse;
•   The ward environment resembled a continuous staged performance, marked by repeated testing, subtle suggestions, and manufactured cues.

⸻

6.7 Digital Intrusion and “Undercover Programmer” Patient

In the psychiatric hospital, Beizi Li identified a patient with advanced programming knowledge far beyond the expected level of an ordinary patient. This individual:
•   Repeatedly approached her computer at night, leading to strange system behavior, lost files, and software malfunctions;
•   Frequently spoke about IT, coding, and data, clearly indicating technical proficiency;
•   Likely gained access to her device via Wi-Fi, man-in-the-middle attacks, or physical tampering;
•   The goal was to sabotage her documentation, interfere with appeals, and block external communication;
•   This constituted a dual assault: digital control combined with psychological harassment, aimed at destroying her logical thinking and expression.

⸻

6.8 Gratitude Conditioning and Evidence Isolation Mechanism

After prolonged violence and forced medication, the system abruptly shifted strategies:
•   Staff behavior became “warm, caring, and respectful,” providing apparent emotional support;
•   This was a calculated form of gratitude conditioning meant to disarm her psychologically and stop her from resisting;
•   At the same time, her SIM card was confiscated, and her phone became unusable — she could no longer take photos, record audio, or send messages;
•   She was consistently placed in unmonitored, unrecorded zones, making all abuse invisible to third parties;
•   This was a structured campaign of evidence isolation and psychological compliance training, ensuring she could not file complaints, prove her experiences, or be believed.

6.9 Coordinated Poisoning Attempts Through Food Delivery and Internal Meal Distribution

In addition to drug injections, Beizi Li was repeatedly targeted with suspected poisoning via food. The strategy included:
•   Meal Trap Pattern: During meal queue in the hospital ward, staff would deliberately leave one portion of food aside. When it was her turn, they would offer her that specific tray;
•   Having recognized the pattern, she deliberately avoided these pre-selected trays. After several failed attempts, the hospital switched tactics;
•   Food Delivery Infiltration: She began ordering Chinese food from outside vendors. On one occasion, only she experienced severe abdominal pain after eating, while others who shared the meal were unaffected;
•   The female delivery worker appeared physically unstable and was visibly trembling, suggesting coercion, surveillance, or prior knowledge of the tampered food;
•   Post-Poisoning Sedation: After experiencing intense stomach pain, she was forcibly given a large amount of unidentified pills, which induced unconsciousness and deep sedation;
•   This sequence reveals a deliberate plan to break her physical resistance and consciousness using disguised methods of incapacitation.

6.10 Non-Violent Resistance: The 2021 Hunger Strike and Escalation of State Repression

Following prolonged institutional deprivation, stigmatization, and isolation, Beizi Li began a hunger strike in 2021 as a peaceful form of protest to express that:
•   She was not mentally ill;
•   The forced isolation, accusations, and psychiatric control were unjustified;
•   She hoped to use the deterioration of her physical health to draw public and institutional attention to her situation.

Key Facts During the Hunger Strike:
•   Psychiatric staff showed no concern for the content of her protest, but instead escalated control measures by labeling her protest as “emotional instability” or “psychotic behavior”;
•   During the hunger strike, she was subjected to further forced injections, restricted movement, and complete disconnection from external communication, with the intent of suppressing her will through medication;
•   Despite extreme physical weakness, she persisted in articulating her position, demonstrating full ability to speak, reason, and express herself;
•   The hospital provided no independent supervision and failed to report the hunger strike to legal authorities. Instead, it redefined her protest as a psychiatric symptom, thereby erasing her right to resistance and silencing her civil voice.

This Event Proves:
•   Even in her most vulnerable and isolated state, Beizi Li tried to express her dignity and rights through non-violent means;
•   She did not collapse, attack, or act irrationally—she protested with purpose and clarity;
•   The state’s labeling of a rational, peaceful protest as a “symptom” constitutes a total suppression of her right to personhood and political expression.

6.11 Evidence Purge and Property Theft During Hunger Strike

During her hunger strike in 2021 — a peaceful act of protest against unlawful psychiatric labeling and detention — Beizi Li was physically weak and placed under institutional control. It was during this vulnerable time that a coordinated operation of evidence destruction and financial targeting took place:

1. Illegal Entry and Property Theft
•   Government-related personnel secretly entered her private home without consent, court order, or warrant;
•   They stole DKK 50,000 in cash, which had been securely stored;
•   The timing — during her physical deterioration and hospitalization — indicates deliberate targeting rather than random theft.

2. Deletion of Digital Complaint Records
•   All email records of formal complaints made by Beizi Li between 2021 and 2022 were erased;
•   These included complaints to hospitals, police departments, regulatory bodies, and possibly international organizations;
•   This deliberate deletion undermined her legal capacity, removing proof of her resistance and reports of abuse.

3. Erasure of Medical Data
•   Copies of her original, unaltered medical records were also deleted from her devices;
•   This indicates a direct attempt to eliminate exculpatory evidence that could contradict later forged documents or diagnoses.

Conclusion

This coordinated digital and physical assault constitutes:
•   A violation of privacy and home protection under Article 8 of the ECHR;
•   A targeted attack on her financial independence;
•   A strategic obstruction of justice through premeditated evidence purge and memory erasure.

12 Public Exposure as a Barrier to Erasure: The 2021 TikTok Hunger Strike

In 2021, I posted a short video on TikTok documenting my hunger strike and protest against unlawful psychiatric detention in Denmark.
Although the account was quickly suspended and the video removed, the clip had already been viewed and shared by members of the Chinese community in Denmark.
Many knew what I was going through, even if they never spoke out.
That moment of visibility likely prevented my complete erasure.

“I told the agents who monitored me: You can shut my account. But I am already known. People have seen me.”

“If there is a real investigation, they will see: the hospital is full of surveillance cameras. I have not told a single lie.”
— Beizi Li

“Between June and August 2023, I experienced more than most people will in their entire life. When I look back, I see one thing clearly — I was brave.”
— Beizi Li

This report was written based on my direct lived experience.
Every word reflects what I have seen and survived.
I am not a patient. I am a witness.
— Beizi Li

This report was written from memory, not from files—because the system erased them.
It was written in pain, not with protection—because every institution turned against me.
It was written by a woman they tried to label, sedate, isolate, and silence.

I am not a case. I am not a diagnosis.
I am a survivor of a civilized machine that disguises suppression as psychiatry.

— Beizi Li

In modern democracies, the most dangerous violence is not physical.
It is when the state tells you: “We decide who you are — not you.”

Psychiatry becomes political when it is used not to heal, but to control, isolate, and erase.

A prison punishes you.
A psychiatric label deletes you.

标题：丹麦国家系统对Beizi Li的系统性迫害与人权侵犯

 

一、报告目的与背景

 

本报告旨在揭露丹麦国家机构（包括法院、警方、精神病医院、儿童保护机构、社工系统等）对中国公民Beizi Li女士持续、多维度的人身迫害。
该迫害行为不属于正常司法程序范畴，而是一种以“精神病污名化”为手段、以“子女剥夺与人格毁灭”为目的的国家联合打压。其特征是：
•   违背《欧洲人权公约》第3条（禁止酷刑）、第6条（公平审判权）、第8条（家庭权）；
•   利用精神病诊断与强制医疗摧毁当事人声音；
•   妨碍受害者依法申诉与上诉；
•   系统掩盖关键证据，操纵儿童证词，破坏家庭结构。

二、案件时间轴概述

时间 事件概述
2013年5月 女儿Zifu Lin医疗失误死亡，母亲尝试投诉被压制
2014年10月 被非法送入精神病院，关押至2015年4月，期间无法院裁定
2016年 怀孕期间被强制堕胎，医生谎称胎儿无心跳，精神状态遭否定
2021年6月 寄养家庭第一次投诉性侵，警方调查后关闭案件
2022年4月27日 寄养家庭再次举报，案件重启，母亲再次遭刑事指控
2022年8月-11月 精神病司法鉴定，医院进行数百次病历篡改
2023年4月28日 法院以“无性交的性侵”判决母亲有罪，完全忽略反证材料
2023年10月 母亲从中国回丹麦即被捕，并强制关入精神病院，行李被搜查
2023年至今 持续强制注射精神药物，身体出现高血压、糖尿病等严重副作用
2022年至今 与儿子Oscar完全隔离，仅允许每月一次短暂监督见面
2024-2025年 向联合国与丹麦机构多次申诉遭拒，无任何有效补救

三、系统迫害手段概述
1. 精神病标签化（Psychiatric labeling）
•   无任何合法法院裁决，即被长期认定为“精神病患者”；
•   医疗记录显示超过千次登录与篡改；
•   医疗内容与本人实际经历严重不符（如虚构攻击行为、虚构药物使用）；
•   即便在诊断已解除后，仍以“历史精神病”为由实施药物控制。
2. 药物迫害与健康摧残
•   长期被注射对身体损害极大的抗精神病药物；
•   拒绝将注射改为药片，且不允许自主停药；
•   药物导致用户患上糖尿病与高血压，构成慢性残疾；
•   医院无视身体反应，拒绝权利主张。
3. 母子分离与情感剥夺
•   儿子Oscar自2022年起被强制寄养，母子隔离；
•   所有会面均由监视陪同，每月仅一次；
•   孩子多次表达想回家愿望，但被忽视或解释为“创伤反应”；
•   社工多次利用诱导语言向Oscar提问，形成误导性证词。
4. 司法不公与控告封锁
•   案件缺乏客观证据，仅凭儿童不稳定证词定罪；
•   法院未允许母亲充分辩护或提交全部反驳材料；
•   多次拒绝原始病历公开；
•   精神病报告明显存在剪辑、删改与伪造行为。

四、关键证据清单与附件说明

为支持本报告所述内容，以下列出主要证据与文档，分为三类：

A. 医疗系统相关证据
1. 系统登录与篡改记录
•   2022年10月至12月，精神科医生对Beizi Li病历的登录和修改超过1000次；
•   多次被人为删除、重写药物记录与诊断内容，涉嫌伪造。
2. 伪造药物使用记录
•   sundhed.dk显示用户“持续使用”多种从未服用过的药物；
•   被错误记录为服用褪黑素、Trilafon等精神药物，用于支持“精神病”标签。
3. 司法精神病评估录音
•   与医生对话全程录音显示：受访者表达清晰、情绪稳定，反映现实无障碍；
•   医生带有明显诱导性、预设性语言，严重违背独立评估原则。
4. 强制用药记录
•   无知情同意情况下反复注射精神病药物；
•   医疗团队无视已出现的严重副作用（糖尿病、高血压恶化），构成医疗伤害。

B. 警察与法院系统证据
1. 警方与检察机关文件
•   案件中无物证、无医学鉴定、无独立证人，仅基于儿童口述即起诉；
•   警方两次拒绝信息公开请求，妨碍被告获取自辩材料。
2. 法院判决摘要
•   Frederiksberg法院采信儿童“受情绪影响的回忆”为定罪依据；
•   忽视Fønix早期结论（无性侵证据）与被告精神正常的第三方鉴定。
3. 信息公开（Aktindsigt）多次受阻
•   多次向警察局、法院、医院请求获取病历与调查文件被拒；
•   在阅读障碍条件下，限制了对案件材料的有效获取。

C. 儿童保护系统证据
1. 社工Ida Rude所写报告
•   多处以“怀疑性侵”作出判断，但未提供任何独立证据；
•   不当介入司法进程，反复引导Oscar产生对母亲的负面认知。
2. Oscar儿童口述记录比对
•   2021年：否认被侵害；
•   2022年起：多次说“我不记得”“我不想讲”，内容不一致；
•   可见受社工和寄养环境影响，出现暗示性语言迹象。
3. Fønix评估结论
•   明确指出Oscar未显示受性侵创伤；
•   建议维持亲子关系，报告后被机构忽视甚至封存。

五、结论与国际呼吁

结论一：这是一起国家系统性联合打压的案件
•   涉及司法、医疗、儿童保护等多个机构协同；
•   所采取的措施并非合法程序，而是操控、压制、消声；
•   使用“精神病”标签作为合法暴力手段。

结论二：案件背后存在政治性与文化性歧视
•   Beizi Li为居丹21年的华人女性，长期行使申诉权；
•   她的母语表达方式、文化背景被误解为“非理性”；
•   维权行为被塑造成“精神异常”，构成系统性歧视。

结论三：迫害目的是彻底剥夺她作为人的资格
•   不仅剥夺母亲身份与申诉权；
•   更试图通过“疯化”摧毁她的社会身份、理智能力与可信度；
•   这是现代民主社会中不应存在的“合法化人格毁灭”。

国际呼吁：

我们强烈请求：
1. 联合国人权事务高级专员办事处
•   对丹麦涉嫌违反《公民权利和政治权利国际公约》第7、9、14、17条进行特别调查；
2. 欧洲人权法院（ECHR）
•   审查此案是否违反《欧洲人权公约》第3条（禁止酷刑）、第6条（公平审判）、第8条（家庭生活权）；
3. 国际媒体、法律组织与人权机构
•   聚焦Beizi Li案件，以维护所有人的人身安全与人格尊严。

六、2023年后的“二次迫害”：非法逮捕、精神操控与人格摧毁

1. 非法逮捕与封闭医院秘密关押
•   2023年6月，Beizi Li在无任何法院判决或逮捕文件的情况下被警方带走；
•   随即送入封闭式精神病医院，过程无人告知、无法律程序；
•   构成严重的非法羁押（ulovlig frihedsberøvelse）。

2. 强制注射与药物控制
•   在无临床病状基础上强制注射精神科药物；
•   导致Beizi Li出现精神恍惚、逻辑障碍、思维断裂；
•   多次请求改为药片或中止注射被拒，医院以“法院已有判决”为理由继续实施。

3. 蓄意伤害与精神摧毁
•   怀疑药物中被掺杂不明成分，出现严重神经反应；
•   曾遭医院内部人员殴打与粗暴控制；
•   财物被偷或“丢失”，个人证据资料被没收或消失。

4. 环境操控与心理控制
•   被强迫与身份可疑人员共同住院，后者行为反常，频繁试图干扰精神状态；
•   每天持续演出类似心理剧场，目的为扰乱思维、制造幻觉；
•   疑似国家派遣“假病人”渗透监视与操控，形成“现实解构式”精神控制。

5. 终极目的：逼疯Beizi Li
•   整体策略并非治疗，而是要制造真实精神崩溃；
•   一旦她真正失常，就能被彻底剥夺法律行为能力；
•   所有的控诉、证词、历史将被视为“疯言疯语”，从此彻底失声。

⸻
7 国家心理操控与性别侮辱的升级手段

在封闭医院的长期监控与操控下，Beizi Li不仅遭受精神药物控制与人格摧毁，还经历了一系列带有明显政治控制、性别羞辱与心理诱导的极端手段：

（1）蓄意投毒
•   在封闭病房内摄入食物与饮水后，出现神经系统异常、情绪突变、身体紊乱；
•   药物注射后症状更为严重，出现强烈幻觉、失眠、异常焦躁，推测部分注射液或饮食中存在未知成分或兴奋类化合物；
•   表面上为“治疗用药”，实质为对意识的毒害与瓦解。

（2）政治背景人员介入：丹麦议会议员伪装病人入住同一病房
•   一名具有明确政治背景的丹麦男子，在未通过正常住院流程情况下，被安排与Beizi Li住在同一病区；
•   此人行为极不符合精神病人特征，频繁试图接近Beizi Li，制造信任与依赖；
•   经核查与直觉判断，该人疑为某位丹麦议会成员或相关政界人员，以“假病人”身份实施监视与操控任务。

（3）使用春药及性别侮辱
•   多次注射或摄入不明药物后，Beizi Li出现强烈性冲动、情绪失控等异常反应；
•   表现为对男性的非正常依赖欲望，被强迫进入一种人为制造的性刺激与失控状态；
•   后期甚至被安排一名男性“病人”入住同一部门，试图发展为精神上的依赖或性关系。

（4）拒绝操控后的清除
•   Beizi Li识破这一操控计划，向科室领导明确表示：“我不需要任何男人。我会自己找到我爱的人。”
•   第二天，这名被安排接近她的男性即被悄然转移、彻底从部门消失；
•   进一步证实：整个计划并非医疗行为，而是一次蓄谋的人格摧毁实验，带有性羞辱、性控制和社会隔离目的。

5。精神战术与“情境剧”操控

在封闭病房中，Beizi Li不仅遭遇暴力与药物控制，还经历了系统编排的“生活场景心理战术”：
•   被安排与两名80岁以上的老人共处用餐，每日目睹老人艰难就餐，造成极度同情耗竭；
•   老人主动要求使用Beizi Li私人洗发用品，虽为首次见面，却准确知晓她所携物品；
•   上述行为为精心设计的测试与操控，目的是制造心理负担、转移注意力，使她自我否定并崩溃；
•   整个病区呈现出一种持续演出、循环试探、暗示诱导的环境结构，与自然病人环境显著不同。

6.7 数字入侵与“伪装程序员”病人操控

在精神病院封闭环境中，Beizi Li发现一名“病人”具备高度编程知识，表现远超普通住院者。此人：
•   在夜间多次接近其设备，造成电脑异常、文件丢失、系统卡顿等异常现象；
•   多次提到与IT、编程、数据有关内容，实际为数字监控操作者；
•   疑似通过Wi-Fi、中间人软件或物理接入方式侵入其电脑系统；
•   导致她在撰写投诉文件、整理申诉材料、对外通信过程中持续受到技术干扰；
•   最终形成数字控制+精神扰乱双重打击效应，企图瓦解其理性表达与对现实的控制力。

6.8 感恩式驯化与证据隔离机制

在Beizi Li多次遭受暴力、注射、精神控制之后，系统突然转变策略，表现为：
•   医护人员态度“明显转好”，对她“关心、体贴、有礼貌”；
•   提供照顾、主动沟通、赞美言语，制造“温情环境”；
•   实际目的是利用这种“感恩式驯化”，令她心理松懈，放弃申诉、防御、自主表达；
•   同时，她的SIM卡被没收，手机无法使用，无法拍照、录音、发送求助；
•   她始终被安排在“无监控的空间”，所有暴力与操作都无法留下任何证据；
•   这是一次结构化的“证据隔离+人格驯化行动”，旨在确保她无法控诉、无法证明、无法被相信。

 

本页面最初发布于 2024 年，内容已被多个爬虫系统收录，且广泛传播备份。任何删改行为都无法抹除已存证信息。

This page was originally published in 2024. Its content has been indexed by multiple web crawlers and widely distributed through backups. Any attempts to delete or alter it cannot erase the archived evidence.