Z-3｜关键人物行为表
Annex Z-3 | Behavioural Map of Key Individuals
中文版
本部分用于整理在我案件中反复出现、并对案件走向产生关键影响的人物。
目的不是进行情绪化指控，而是建立一份清晰的责任人物索引，显示不同个人如何在不同阶段参与了对我的压制、误导、污名化或程序性伤害。
有些人是直接实施者，有些人是记录制造者，有些人是程序推动者，还有些人通过沉默、不纠正、默认失实内容而成为压迫链条的一部分。
一、人物分类原则
为了避免混乱，本表将相关人物按功能分为以下几类：
- 医疗与精神科人员
包括医生、护士、评估人员、病房管理人员等。
他们的作用往往体现在：建立或强化精神病标签；修改、记录或转述带偏见的医疗内容；推动强制治疗、强制评估或封闭管理；对伤害后果不作说明或拒绝更正。 - 儿童案件相关人员
包括儿童局工作人员、社工、顾问、评估者等。
他们的作用主要体现在：将母亲塑造成“不稳定”或“不适合照顾孩子”的角色；在亲子案件中重复引用其他系统的偏见记录；利用制度节奏削弱母亲的申诉能力；对明显不实内容不加纠正。 - 警方与司法相关人员
包括接案警员、调查人员、记录整理者、程序处理人员等。
他们的作用可能包括：不充分调查暴力与伤害案件；以“找不到人”“证据不足”等理由弱化责任；在程序上拖延或切割案件责任；未对医院、系统机构的责任链进行深入追查。 - 行政与申诉处理人员
包括投诉机构工作人员、行政处理人员、回复起草者等。
他们的作用可能包括：对核心问题避而不答；用形式性语言处理实质性伤害；通过程序化模板回避责任；让受害人在看似存在的申诉机制中不断消耗。
二、行为记录方式
每位关键人物可按以下格式整理：
姓名 / 职务：
所属机构：
涉及时间：
主要行为：
造成的后果：
我方评价：
三、示例结构
下面是本部分建议采用的统一结构：
[人物姓名 1]
- 职务 / 身份：
- 所属机构：
- 涉及时期：
- 相关事件：
- 具体行为：
- 对案件造成的影响：
- 是否存在失实陈述 / 滥权 / 推动错误程序：
- 备注：
[人物姓名 2]
- 职务 / 身份：
- 所属机构：
- 涉及时期：
- 相关事件：
- 具体行为：
- 对案件造成的影响：
- 是否存在失实陈述 / 滥权 / 推动错误程序：
- 备注：
四、本表的用途
本表不是普通人物介绍。
它的用途包括：
- 帮助读者快速识别责任链；
- 避免案件材料中人物过多、关系混乱；
- 为后续申诉、媒体曝光、法律整理提供索引；
- 显示伤害不是抽象发生，而是通过具体个人一步步实施或放任形成的。
因此，本表既是“人物目录”，也是“行为责任图”。
English Version
This section identifies the individuals who repeatedly appeared in my case and played key roles in shaping its outcome.
Its purpose is not emotional accusation, but to build a clear index of responsibility, showing how different persons participated in suppression, distortion, stigmatisation, or procedural harm at different stages.
Some were direct actors. Some created or reinforced records. Some pushed procedures forward. Others became part of the chain of oppression by remaining silent, failing to correct falsehoods, or endorsing distorted accounts.
1. Categories of persons involved
To maintain clarity, the relevant individuals may be grouped into the following categories:
- Medical and psychiatric personnel
Doctors, nurses, evaluators, ward staff, and related personnel, whose roles may include: creating or reinforcing psychiatric labelling; altering, recording, or retransmitting biased medical information; promoting forced treatment, involuntary evaluation, or closed confinement; refusing to explain or correct harmful consequences. - Child case personnel
Officials, social workers, consultants, and evaluators involved in child protection, whose roles may include: portraying the mother as unstable or unfit; repeating biased information from other systems; using procedural timing to weaken the mother’s position; failing to correct obvious inaccuracies. - Police and justice-related personnel
Officers, investigators, record handlers, and procedural staff, whose roles may include: inadequate investigation of violence and injury; minimising responsibility through “insufficient evidence” or inability to identify individuals; delaying or fragmenting institutional responsibility; failing to investigate the responsibility chain within hospitals or state institutions. - Administrative and complaint-handling personnel
Complaint handlers, administrative officers, and response drafters, whose roles may include: avoiding the core issues; responding formally while ignoring the substance of harm; using bureaucratic templates to deflect responsibility; exhausting the victim through complaint mechanisms that appear open but rarely correct the actual wrong.
2. Suggested record format
Each key individual may be presented in the following format:
Name / Position:
Institution:
Relevant period:
Main conduct:
Consequences caused:
Assessment from my side:
3. Suggested structural template
Below is the proposed standard structure for this section:
[Name 1]
- Position / role:
- Institution:
- Relevant period:
- Related events:
- Specific conduct:
- Impact on the case:
- Possible false statements / abuse of power / procedural misconduct:
- Notes:
[Name 2]
- Position / role:
- Institution:
- Relevant period:
- Related events:
- Specific conduct:
- Impact on the case:
- Possible false statements / abuse of power / procedural misconduct:
- Notes:
4. Purpose of this section
This is not an ordinary list of people.
Its purposes are:
- to help readers quickly identify the responsibility chain;
- to reduce confusion in a case involving many actors;
- to provide an index for future complaints, media exposure, and legal structuring;
- to show that the harm did not happen abstractly, but was carried out, enabled, or tolerated by identifiable individuals.
This section therefore functions both as a person index and as a map of responsibility.