Case Position

Formal Complaint

To Whom It May Concern,

I am submitting this complaint regarding the institutional failure that followed
a physical assault against me inside the closed psychiatric ward at Psykiatrisk Center Amager on 23 June 2023.

This complaint is not limited to the identity of the individual who physically assaulted me.
It concerns the broader failure of the hospital and responsible authorities to ensure patient safety,
document the incident properly, provide adequate follow-up, and establish accountability afterward.

I was assaulted inside a closed psychiatric ward — not in a public street,
and not by an unknown random passerby.
This means the incident took place in a controlled institutional environment where staff presence,
responsibility, and supervision should have been clearly traceable.

I reported the incident to the police in 2023.
However, in March 2026, after finally being questioned again,
I was informed that the police could not identify or locate the person who assaulted me.

I find this deeply unacceptable.
If a patient can be physically assaulted inside a closed psychiatric unit,
and the institution is still unable or unwilling to identify who was responsible,
then this reflects not merely an individual act of violence,
but a serious failure of supervision, incident management, and institutional accountability.

I also submitted a complaint concerning the hospital’s supervisory failure.
However, I was informed that the matter would not be handled because it was said to fall under police jurisdiction.
This creates a situation in which each authority shifts responsibility away,
while no institution addresses the actual failure that occurred.

My complaint therefore concerns the following issues:

• Failure to protect a patient from physical assault inside a closed ward;
• Failure to ensure a traceable chain of responsibility among staff on duty;
• Failure to document and internally process the incident in a transparent manner;
• Failure to provide meaningful institutional follow-up after the incident;
• Failure of authorities to address the hospital’s supervisory and safety responsibilities independently of the criminal investigation.

The key issue is simple:
the fact that police claim they cannot identify the individual assailant does not remove the institution’s responsibility.
On the contrary, it raises even more serious questions about how such violence could occur inside a closed psychiatric setting without clear accountability.

I therefore request that this matter be assessed not only as an isolated assault,
but as a case of institutional failure, supervisory negligence, and procedural avoidance of responsibility.

I ask that the responsible authority review:

• whether the hospital fulfilled its duty to protect me as a patient;
• whether the incident was internally recorded and handled properly;
• whether relevant staff and supervisors were identified and reviewed;
• whether responsibility was improperly shifted between police and health authorities without real investigation.

This complaint is submitted as part of a broader documented evidence chain.
Related files include:

• E-18 — Primary incident evidence;
• E-19 — Post-assault injury documentation;
• E-20 — Complaint and follow-up record.

Sincerely,
Beizi Li

Why This Page Matters

This page is not intended to re-document the violence itself.
The violence is already documented in E-18, and the physical aftermath is documented in E-19.

The purpose of E-20 is to show what happened after the assault:
formal complaint, shifting of responsibility, lack of clear institutional handling,
and the broader problem of accountability failure.

Related Evidence Chain