E-31 | Pre-Removal Government Submission
Indstillingsmateriale · Administrative Submission Before Removal
Key Finding
This document is not a neutral report. It is an operational submission used to justify a pre-determined outcome.
Decision first → justification constructed afterward
Structural Issues
1. Outcome Defined in Advance
The submission already proposes removal of the child and termination of contact before presenting justification.
Evidence: The Indstilling section directly states the proposed removal and contact restriction.
2. Justification Based on “Assessment” Language
The document relies heavily on phrases such as “we assess” and “risk,” without presenting verifiable evidence.
Evidence: Justification relies on evaluative language rather than concrete facts.
3. Psychiatric Label as a Central Tool
Psychiatric diagnosis is used as a core argument to question parental capacity and justify intervention.
Evidence: Psychiatric conclusions are used as direct justification for removal.
Legal and Human Rights Concerns
- Lack of direct, verifiable evidence
- Use of psychiatric labeling as justification for removal
- Coordination between administrative and medical systems
- Substantive deprivation before full legal review
Conclusion
This document marks the transition from evaluation to execution.
It is the starting point of a structured process leading to the removal of the child.