E-17｜2016 Pregnancy Termination and Subsequent Reproductive Intervention Module
This module archives medical records, procedural irregularities, missing official files, and subsequent issues potentially involving reproductive intervention related to the 2016 pregnancy termination event.
This module concerns not only one isolated medical treatment, but also an important chain of evidence that may have continued to affect my bodily autonomy, reproductive rights, and maternal rights.
Core conclusion of this module:
This event was not merely a simple medical accident or an ordinary abortion procedure. It involves lack of transparency in medical procedure, missing key records, abnormal post-operative consequences, and subsequent structural intervention by state systems in reproductive decisions and maternal capacity.
1. Module Structure
This module currently contains the following publicly archived pages:
Records the medical pathway, surgical arrangement, anesthesia, and abnormal post-operative signs during the 2016 pregnancy termination process,
in order to identify key doubts at the level of medical procedure.
Summarizes and analyzes the absence of important medical records, administrative records, and system files related to this event,
in order to show structural gaps and procedural abnormalities in the chain of evidence.
E-17-3｜Post-Operative Reproductive Restriction and State Intervention (Coming Soon)
Will be used to archive later issues concerning contraception, sterilization, reproductive restriction, and threats linking these issues to child custody,
as an important extension of this module.
2. Issues This Module Seeks to Establish
- whether there were abnormal medical decisions, procedural defects, or lack of transparency during the 2016 pregnancy termination process;
- whether abnormal conditions occurred during or after the procedure but were not fully recorded or explained;
- why key medical and administrative records are missing, and whether this involves abnormal record management or deliberate avoidance;
- whether there was continued interference with my bodily autonomy and reproductive rights after the procedure;
- whether this event was later used implicitly or structurally amplified in child welfare, psychiatric, or government assessments.
3. Evidentiary Significance of This Module
The E-17 module is not an isolated medical archive. It is highly relevant to the later handling by child welfare authorities, the construction of psychiatric labeling, the denial of maternal capacity,
and the continued control by state systems over my body and family relationships.
This module will serve as important supporting evidence for the following directions:
- arguments in international complaints concerning violations of reproductive rights and bodily integrity;
- background support in child welfare cases concerning biased evaluation of maternal capacity;
- structural explanation of the “body–family–custody” chain within the broader pattern of systematic persecution;
- factual support material for future claims involving medical liability, procedural responsibility, or state compensation.
4. Note
Some contents in this module are based on my own direct experience, existing documents, fragments of medical records, post-operative consequences, and a combined analysis of subsequent state actions.
For original records that have not yet been fully obtained, this module will continue to be updated through later supplements, complaints, or public archival.