EN-E-13-2
Supervised Contact and Communication Restrictions
Contact Arrangements · Supervised Visits · Communication Limits
This page records the practical arrangements for contact and communication after the separation between the applicant and her son, Oscar Dan Li,
including the form of contact, supervision conditions, and communication restrictions.
The content is based on actual experience and related records, and is intended to show how the contact between mother and child changed under institutional arrangements.
1. Form of Contact
- Contact had to take place under specified conditions.
- Free or ordinary daily meetings were no longer possible.
- Meeting arrangements were decided by the relevant authorities.
- The timing and frequency of contact were restricted.
2. Supervised Contact Conditions
- Third parties were present during contact.
- Communication could not take place in a fully independent setting.
- The interaction between mother and child was limited to a certain extent.
3. Phone and Communication Restrictions
- Phone calls were limited to specific time slots.
- The frequency of calls was restricted.
- Calls could be interrupted by external arrangements or activities.
- The content and duration of communication were difficult to control freely.
4. Practical Impact
Under these arrangements, contact between mother and child changed from a natural daily relationship into a restricted form of communication.
The timing, method, and environment of contact were all altered.
In some situations, the child showed emotional reactions during communication, yet the contact arrangements were not relaxed afterwards.
5. Purpose of This Evidence Page
- To show how contact arrangements were practically carried out.
- To document the change in communication between mother and child.
- To support analysis of how contact restrictions affected the relationship.
- To form part of the broader child protection case structure together with related pages and documents.
This page records the arrangements for contact and communication only. It does not make judgments about the motives or legality of the related measures.