1. Report Purpose and Background / 报告目的与背景

This report aims to expose the ongoing, multi-dimensional persecution of Chinese citizen Ms. Beizi Li by Danish state institutions, including courts, police, psychiatric hospitals, child protection agencies, and social services.

本报告旨在揭露丹麦国家机构（包括法院、警方、精神病医院、儿童保护机构、社工系统等）对中国公民李贝子女士持续、多维度的人身迫害。

These persecutions go beyond normal legal processes and constitute coordinated state repression utilizing psychiatric stigmatization, child removal, and personal destruction.

该迫害行为不属于正常司法程序范畴，而是一种以“精神病污名化”为手段、以“子女剥夺与人格毁灭”为目的的国家联合打压。

• Violations of ECHR Article 3 (Prohibition of torture), Article 6 (Right to fair trial), and Article 8 (Right to family life).
• Use of psychiatric diagnosis and forced medication to silence the victim.
• Obstruction of legal appeals and complaints procedures.
• Systematic evidence suppression, manipulation of child testimonies, and family destruction tactics.

• 违背《欧洲人权公约》第3条（禁止酷刑）、第6条（公平审判权）、第8条（家庭权）；
• 利用精神病诊断与强制医疗摧毁当事人声音；
• 妨碍受害者依法申诉与上诉；
• 系统掩盖关键证据，操纵儿童证词，破坏家庭结构。

2. Case Timeline Overview / 案件时间轴概述

3. Overview of Systemic Persecution Methods / 系统迫害手段概述

3.1 Psychiatric Labeling / 精神病标签化

Declared as a “psychiatric patient” without any lawful court decision. Medical records were repeatedly altered, expanded, or rewritten. Even after psychiatric conclusions became disputed or weakened, the label continued to be used as a tool to justify coercive intervention.

在无任何合法法院裁决情况下，被长期认定为“精神病患者”。病历被多次扩写、篡改、重写。即使相关精神病结论已被削弱或受到质疑，该标签仍持续被用来为强制干预提供借口。

3.2 Drug Abuse and Health Deterioration / 药物迫害与健康摧残

Long-term forced injections of antipsychotic medication were imposed without meaningful informed consent. Repeated requests to switch medication form or stop injections were rejected. Serious health deterioration followed, including diabetes, hypertension, and long-term bodily harm.

长期遭受抗精神病药物强制注射，缺乏真正的知情同意。多次要求更换药物形式或停止注射均被拒绝。随后出现严重健康恶化，包括糖尿病、高血压及长期身体损伤。

3.3 Mother-Child Separation and Emotional Deprivation / 母子分离与情感剥夺

Since 2022, Oscar has been kept in foster care with highly restricted and monitored contact. Expressions of attachment to his mother were ignored, reinterpreted, or neutralized through administrative language and controlled meeting arrangements.

自 2022 年起，Oscar 被持续置于寄养体系中，与母亲的联系被严格限制并受到监视。孩子对母亲的依恋表达被忽视、重新解释，或通过行政语言与受控探视安排被不断中和。

3.4 Judicial Injustice and Complaint Blockade / 司法不公与控告封锁

The legal process relied heavily on unstable statements while excluding rebuttal material, limiting file access, and preventing effective self-defense. Complaints to multiple authorities led repeatedly to delay, silence, referral loops, or rejection without meaningful remedy.

司法程序高度依赖不稳定陈述，同时排除反驳材料、限制阅卷、阻断有效自辩。向多个机构提出的投诉则反复陷入拖延、沉默、转交循环或无实质救济的拒绝。

4. Key Evidence List and Annexes / 关键证据清单与附件说明

A. Medical System Related Evidence / 医疗系统相关证据

1. System Log and Tampering Records / 系统登录与篡改记录
   Over 1000 login and alteration records from psychiatric staff on Beizi Li's medical records between Oct-Dec 2022. Multiple instances of deletion, rewriting, and suspected forgery of drug records and diagnostic content.
   2022年10月至12月，精神科医生对 Beizi Li 病历的登录和修改超过1000次；多次被人为删除、重写药物记录与诊断内容，涉嫌伪造。
2. Forged Medication Usage Records / 伪造药物使用记录
   Sundhed.dk shows false records of continuous use of various psychiatric medications never actually taken by the user.
   Sundhed.dk 显示用户“持续使用”多种从未服用过的药物，以支持“精神病”标签。
3. Full Forensic Psychiatric Evaluation Recordings / 司法精神病评估录音
   Full recordings reveal clear logic, emotional stability, and violations of independent evaluation principles by the doctors’ questioning style.
   与医生对话全程录音显示：受访者表达清晰、情绪稳定；医生存在明显诱导性、预设性语言，违背独立评估原则。
4. Forced Medication Records / 强制用药记录
   Repeated forced injections despite serious side effects, constituting medical abuse.
   在严重副作用已出现的情况下仍持续实施强制注射，构成医疗伤害。

B. Police and Court System Evidence / 警察与法院系统证据

1. Police and Prosecution Documents / 警方与检察机关文件
   No physical evidence, no medical forensics, no independent witnesses; case advanced largely on verbal statements alone.
   案件中无物证、无医学鉴定、无独立证人，仅基于儿童口述即推进起诉。
2. Court Judgment Summary / 法院判决摘要
   The court relied on emotionally influenced recollections while ignoring contrary materials and third-party psychiatric evidence indicating normality.
   法院采信受情绪影响的回忆，忽视反向材料及显示精神正常的第三方证据。
3. Blocked Access to Information / 信息公开多次受阻
   Multiple requests to obtain files, records, and case material were rejected or restricted, hindering defense preparation.
   多次请求获取档案、病历与案件材料被拒或受限，严重妨碍辩护准备。

C. Child Protection System Evidence / 儿童保护系统证据

1. Reports by Social Worker Ida Rude / 社工 Ida Rude 所写报告
   Multiple reports relied on suspicions without independent proof and repeatedly shaped Oscar’s perception of his mother.
   多处以“怀疑性侵”作出判断，但未提供独立证据，并反复影响 Oscar 对母亲的认知。
2. Oscar's Testimony Comparison Records / Oscar 儿童口述记录比对
   Statements shifted over time, including repeated “I don’t remember” and “I don’t want to talk,” showing inconsistency and signs of suggestive influence.
   口述内容随时间变化，多次出现“我不记得”“我不想讲”，表现出不一致及暗示影响迹象。
3. Fønix Assessment Conclusion / Fønix 评估结论
   Early assessment indicated no signs of sexual trauma and recommended preserving the parent-child relationship.
   早期评估明确指出并无性侵创伤迹象，并建议维持亲子关系。

5. Conclusions and International Appeals / 结论与国际呼吁

Conclusion 1 / 结论一

This is a case of coordinated state persecution. It involves coordination between judicial, medical, child protection, and other state bodies. The measures taken were not neutral legal procedures but forms of suppression, manipulation, and silencing.

这是一起国家系统性联合打压案件。 其涉及司法、医疗、儿童保护等多个机构协同。所采取措施并非中立合法程序，而是操控、压制与消声的组合性手段。

Conclusion 2 / 结论二

The case reveals political and cultural discrimination. Beizi Li’s Chinese background, expression style, and insistence on complaint and appeal were repeatedly reinterpreted as irrationality or instability.

案件背后存在政治性与文化性歧视。 李贝子的中国背景、表达方式及持续申诉行为，被反复重塑为“非理性”或“不稳定”，并成为进一步压制的借口。

Conclusion 3 / 结论三

The ultimate goal is dehumanization and silencing. The persecution does not only target parental rights or legal remedies, but also seeks to destroy social identity, credibility, and personhood through legitimized character destruction.

迫害的终极目标是去人格化与彻底消声。 它不仅剥夺母亲身份与申诉权，更试图通过“合法化的人格毁灭”摧毁其社会身份、可信度与作为人的资格。

International Appeals / 国际呼吁

• United Nations Human Rights Office (OHCHR)
  Launch a special investigation into Denmark’s alleged violations of ICCPR Articles 7, 9, 14, and 17.
  联合国人权事务高级专员办事处： 对丹麦涉嫌违反《公民权利和政治权利国际公约》第7、9、14、17条进行特别调查。
• European Court of Human Rights (ECHR)
  Examine violations of ECHR Article 3, Article 6, and Article 8.
  欧洲人权法院（ECHR）： 审查此案是否违反《欧洲人权公约》第3条、第6条、第8条。
• International Media, Legal Organizations, and Human Rights NGOs
  Focus on Beizi Li’s case to defend the safety, dignity, and rights of individuals facing institutional persecution.
  国际媒体、法律组织与人权机构： 关注 Beizi Li 案件，维护遭受制度性迫害者的人身安全、人格尊严与基本权利。