Annex Z-1 · Full Timeline of State Suppression against Beizi Li
♀️ Introduction:
This page is the first part of the Z-Series documents. It systematically presents how, since 2014,
Beizi Li has faced continuous persecution and control from multiple Danish public institutions — including the police,
prosecutors, psychiatric units, hospitals, and the child protection bureau.
These are not isolated incidents, but coordinated, consistent, and purposeful acts of
institutional slaughter, systematically destroying Beizi Li’s human rights, parental rights,
the right to a fair record, and medical transparency.
Chapter Overview:
1. Interference and Misguidance by the Child Protection System (2014–Present)
- Repeated attempts to suppress maternal custody, ignoring the mother’s protests and factual evidence.
- Use of fabricated or purpose-driven records (such as “activity logs” and “behavior reports”) as the sole basis for decisions.
- Forced separation of mother and child for more than two years (the Oscar case).
2. Strict Bureaucratic Enforcement and Information Blockade
- Victims’ police reports refused or deliberately delayed from investigation.
- Assault and sexual-violence cases shelved or indefinitely postponed, in violation of legal deadlines.
- Repeated denial of access to official files (Aktindsigt), effectively blocking flexible appeals and accountability.
3. Psychiatric System’s Judgments and Labeling Mechanisms
- Diagnoses issued before any official psychiatric evaluation or community assessment — including the 2022 declaration labeling her as “mentally ill.”
- Multiple coordinated approvals of forced treatment (injections of antipsychotic medication), without valid consent and against medical ethics.
- Medical records edited or overwritten hundreds of times, erasing original data and professional comments to conceal malpractice.
4. The Medical System’s Protection Without Evidence
- Refusal to take responsibility for the misdiagnosis that led to her daughter’s death.
- Denial of access to original diagnostic data and metadata, obstructing independent review and medical transparency.
- Appeal committees either dismissed the case or systematically avoided addressing core institutional responsibility.
5. National Complaint System Providing No Real Protection
- Complaints endlessly bounced between authorities — from police to prosecutors, then to internal police units — ensuring no accountability.
- UN-level complaints rejected as “insufficient information,” despite complete documentation, deliberately underrating the evidence.
- Official complaint materials often refused, returned, or left unregistered, effectively silencing all channels of appeal.
Annex Links:
Download the Full PDF Report
Case Timeline Overview (Graphical Version)
Original Replies and Institutional Letters (Scanned Attachments)