Document Type: Official case decision by the Danish National Social Appeals Board

Case Number: 25-5890

Date: 27 March 2025

Issued to: Beizi Li & Lin Qiang

Child Involved: Oscar Dan Li (b. 12 May 2015)

Decision Summary: Oscar will remain placed outside of the family home under forced care.

1. Purpose and Background of the Report

This report aims to document and expose the long-term, multi-sector persecution of Chinese citizen Ms. Beizi Li by institutions of the Danish state — including the courts, police, psychiatric hospitals, child protection authorities, and social services.

The actions taken against her do not reflect isolated incidents or standard legal procedures. Rather, they form a coordinated campaign of systemic repression, in which psychiatric labeling is used as a central instrument to achieve two primary goals: the removal of her child, and the erasure of her personal and legal identity.

2. Case Timeline Overview – Beizi Li

• May 2013: Daughter Zifu Lin died due to suspected medical error. Mother’s attempt to file a complaint was suppressed.
• October 2014 – April 2015: Mother was involuntarily committed to a psychiatric hospital without any court ruling. Detained for six months.
• 2016: Forced abortion during early pregnancy. Doctor falsely claimed fetus had no heartbeat.
• June 2021: Foster family filed the first sexual abuse accusation. Case was reopened in 2022.
• April 2023: Mother was convicted of rape, despite no physical evidence. The verdict ignored exculpatory evidence.
• June – August 2023: Mother was illegally arrested and placed in a closed psychiatric ward. Subjected to forced medication.
• 2024 – 2025: Multiple appeals to the UN and Danish authorities rejected without effective remedy.

3. Forced Separation from Child and Violation of Family Life

Since 2022, Ms. Li’s son, Oscar, has been placed in full-time foster care under state custody, resulting in total separation from his mother. All contact is strictly supervised and limited to one short visit per month.

4. Judicial Injustice and Suppression of Legal Remedy

Ms. Li’s conviction was based on contradictory testimony from a minor, without any physical or medical evidence. The court denied her the opportunity to present a full defense, submit exculpatory materials, or challenge psychiatric assumptions.

5. Key Evidence Inventory and Annex Summary

This section lists key documents and pieces of evidence supporting the claims made in this report, divided into three categories: Medical System-Related Evidence, Police and Court System Evidence, and Child Protection System Evidence.

6. International Appeals

We strongly urge the following actions:

• Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights (OHCHR) to initiate a special investigation.
• European Court of Human Rights (ECHR) to conduct judicial review based on potential violations of human rights.
• International Media, Legal Organizations, and Human Rights NGOs to raise global awareness and protect human dignity.

7. Post-2023 Secondary Persecution: Illegal Detention, Psychological Manipulation, and Identity Destruction

This section describes further psychological manipulation, forced injections, and systemic isolation that Ms. Li faced in the following years.